Cookies & Site Data

We use only essential storage to remember your disclaimer acknowledgment and cookie choice. We do not load third-party analytics or advertising trackers today. You can review the details in our Cookie Policy.

Back to DPDPA practice
DPDPA · Enterprise & Significant Data Fiduciaries

Two halves of the same
programme.

What a separate legal advisor and a systems integrator cannot do together — one firm does in a single mandate.

A Significant Data Fiduciary running a complex DPDPA programme does not need a law firm and a consulting house in parallel. It needs the regulatory authority of a courtroom Advocate and the planet-scale engineering of a hyperscaler veteran, signed under one letter of engagement, accountable to one board.

For
  • Significant Data Fiduciaries (SDFs)
  • Listed entities · regulated sectors
  • Multi-region cloud estates
  • AI-augmented Data Fiduciaries
  • Cross-border data operators (Section 16)
The combined signal

DRMLAW is the only Indian techno-legal practice where both founding partners hold concurrent C.DPO.DA certification from FDPPI. This means a single firm can provide the statutory DPO appointment, the independent data audit, the engineering programme to implement controls, and the litigation representation before the Data Protection Board — without handoff risk between a law firm and a separate IT consultant. For a Significant Data Fiduciary managing a complex DPDPA programme, this eliminates the most common point of failure in compliance delivery: the gap between legal advice and technical execution.

Two halves of one programme

One mandate. One accountable signature.

Regulatory authority

Dipak Ranjan Mukherjee

Founder Partner · Advocate, Calcutta HC · C.DPO.DA · AI Governance · CCLP

30+ years at the bar; appearances before the Supreme Court of India, NCLT and arbitral tribunals. Carries the statutory mandate to act before the Data Protection Board and on appeal before TDSAT.

  • Section 10 statutory DPO appointment for SDFs
  • Section 20 / 17(2) independent Data Audit posture
  • Section 27 representation before the Data Protection Board of India
  • Section 29 appellate practice before TDSAT
  • AI governance & algorithmic accountability advisory for boards
Planet-scale engineering

Rupak Ranjan Mukherjee

Founder Partner · Ex-Oracle (OCI), TCS · C.DPO.DA · CCLP · NIST AI RMF · ISO/IEC 42001

25+ years of enterprise technology leadership. Led Privacy Engineering for an internal Oracle division in Europe through live GDPR implementation in the UK in 2018 — 40+ vendor systems, consent re-architecture, breach response, board-level reporting.

  • OCI and hyperscaler data estate mapping at production scale
  • Consent ledger, retention engine and DSAR pipeline engineering
  • Section 8(6) breach detection and intimation workflows
  • AI / ML pipeline guardrails aligned to NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001
  • Cutting-edge security guidance — PETs, tokenisation, policy-based access
The institutional argument

An institutional delivery capability — not a project team

Most DPDPA programmes for SDFs and large enterprises fail at the seam between the law firm's opinion and the systems integrator's implementation. DRMLAW removes the seam. The same lead lawyer who advises the board on DPB risk is also the one signing the Section 10 DPO statement. The same engineer who designs the OCI control plane is also the one whose evidence base the audit relies on. One firm. One mandate. One letter of engagement. One accountable signature.

What it gives the enterprise

Engineering, AI guidance, and litigation readiness — in the same mandate.

01

Deep, planet-scale privacy & cloud engineering

Multi-region OCI deployments, hyperscaler data estate mapping, identity and access architecture, operational resilience and SRE-grade incident discipline — the same posture that powered the 2018 UK GDPR live rollout, brought now to Indian SDFs.

02

Cutting-edge security & AI guidance

PETs (data minimisation, pseudonymisation, tokenisation, policy-based access), bug-bounty programmes as a compliance control, NIST AI RMF risk tiering, ISO/IEC 42001 management-system controls — practical guardrails that survive both an audit and a board-level review.

03

Litigation-ready compliance

Every control is documented for the Section 20 / 17(2) independent audit, the Section 27 DPB inquiry, and the Section 29 TDSAT appeal. Compliance is not the destination — defensibility is.

What this combined posture replaces

What this combined posture replaces

Was
A separate large legal team plus a separate systems integrator
Is now
One firm — same lead lawyer signs the Section 10 DPO statement and the engineering control sheet
Was
A law firm that delivers a 200-page opinion no engineer can implement
Is now
An opinion that lands directly in the SDLC as enforceable engineering tickets
Was
A consulting firm that cannot stand up in a DPB inquiry
Is now
A practice whose lead partner is enrolled to argue under Section 27 the same day
Was
Two vendors blaming each other when enforcement lands
Is now
One accountable signature on the engagement
In one line

Enterprise DPDPA is not a procurement question.
It is a single-mandate question.

DRMLAW
DRMLAW
Techno-Legal

DRMLAW is a techno-legal practice combining traditional advocacy with data protection counsel and digital forensics, in compliance with the Bar Council of India's rules on advertisement.

Offices
Kolkata — Office I
7A, K.S. Roy Road
2nd Floor, Suite #10/10
Kolkata 700001
Fax +91 33 22310767
Kolkata — Office II
BJ 19, Sector II, Salt Lake
Kolkata 700091
Bengaluru
153/A, 18th Main, 24th Cross
Sector 3, HSR Layout
Bengaluru 560102, India
© 2026 DRMLAW • drmlaw.in/technolegal
Cookie Policy
Bar Council of India Rules disclaimer: The information on this website is provided for general informational purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes solicitation, advertisement or legal advice. Communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship.

Made with Emergent